Citation Numbers: 42 A.D.2d 771
Filed Date: 7/30/1973
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2022
In this proceeding under sections 750 and 751 of the Judiciary Law to punish appellants, the Clarkstown Teachers’ Association, Inc. and its officers, for willful contempt of two temporary injunction orders of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated September 2, 1972 and September 6, 1972, respectively, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated November 21, 1972, which granted the application and imposed fines upon appellants, payable to the plaintiff Board of Education. Order modified, on the law, by striking therefrom the decretal provisions that the fines are to he paid “ to plaintiff ” and substituting therefor provisions that they are to be paid to the County Treasurer of Rockland County. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In the light of the recent determination of the Court of Appeals in Goodman v. State of New York (31 N Y 2d 381), we determine that the fines imposed by the order under review should be paid to the County Treasurer of Rockland County and not to the plaintiff Board of Education. In Goodman, unions representing public employees (sanitation men, teachers and supervisory personnel) were held in contempt of court for directing their members to strike in violation of injunctions to enforce tbe Taylor Law (Civil Service Law, § 200 et seq.). The unions were punished by fines imposed — as at bar — under section 751 of the Judiciary Law. That statute involves “punishment for criminal contempts”. The fines in Goodman were paid to the plaintiff, as the County Clerk. Declaratory judgment was sought as to whether the City of New York, the aggrieved employer, or the State of New York, representing the public generally, should receive the fines. Chief Judge Puld, writing for the court, after noting that the city, as the employer, was the directly aggrieved party and had the expense of invoking the Taylor Law sanctions, held (p. 385) that nevertheless, “criminal contempt of court, though it may be charged in a civil proceeding, has, as its name implies, criminal overtones. A fine for criminal contempt, we have declared, is ‘ a punishment for the wrong in the interest of public justice, and not in the interest of an individual litigant’ * * Accordingly, as in the case of other criminal offenses * * * it is our view that fines for criminal contempt must, under section 791 of the Judiciary Law, be deemed payable to the treasurer of the county in which the court imposing them is sitting” Beth-El Nosp. v. Davis (231 N. Y. S. 2d 635, affd. 18 A D 2d 1138) is distinguishable, because: (a) there, the contempt for violating the injunction against striking was found to be a civil as well as criminal contempt; (b) here, the contempt order holds appellants in criminal contempt only; (c) there, the Taylor Law, permitting criminal contempt proceedings for sanctions under section 751 of the Judiciary Law, was not involved; and (d) here, the Taylor Law, more particularly section 211 of the Civil Service Law, is the controlling statute. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur. Benjamin, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order, with the following memorandum: In my opinion the fines imposed should be paid to the aggrieved party and not to the County Treasurer of Rockland County.