Filed Date: 1/14/2010
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
We confirm. The misbehavior report and the hearing testimony of its author provide substantial evidence in support of the determination of guilt (see Matter of Sanders v Goord, 47 AD3d 987, 988 [2008]). Petitioner’s testimony that he was not involved in the fight created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Johnson v Rock, 64 AD3d 1096 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 713 [2009]). Finally, we reject petitioner’s contention that the Hearing Officer erred by failing to exonerate him following the viewing at the hearing of a videotape of the melee, as our review of the videotape confirms that there is no information contained therein that contradicted the misbehavior report (see Matter of Addison v Selsky, 256 AD2d 787, 788 [1998]). Petitioner’s remaining claims, including that the Hearing Officer was biased, have been considered and found lacking in merit.
Cardona, EJ., Spain, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.