Filed Date: 6/1/2010
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J.), entered December 2, 2009, which incorporated an interim order denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, granted defendant’s cross motion for sanctions to the extent of imposing sanctions in the amount of $2,635, and denied that portion of the cross motion seeking summary dismissal of the complaint or limitation of damages, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
General Business Law § 185, which refers to a job applicant’s fee, is not applicable in this case, and defendant’s efforts to apply it by analogy are unpersuasive.
Given the withdrawal by plaintiffs counsel of a prior motion for summary judgment without notice to his adversary, it was not an improvident exercise of the court’s discretion to conclude that said counsel had wasted the time of the court and defense counsel, warranting sanctions (see CCS Communication Control v Kelly Intl. Forwarding Co., 166 AD2d 173, 175 [1990]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Sweeny, Acosta, Renwick and Román, JJ.