Filed Date: 6/1/2010
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
In a
Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court’s determination that the father’s consent to the adoption was not required was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Matter of Kevin A., Jr., 61 AD3d 859, 860 [2009]; Matter of Serenity Anya C., 60 AD3d 852 [2009]; Matter of Sharissa G., 51 AD3d 1019, 1020 [2008]; Matter of Hassan Lawrence W., 42 AD3d 573 [2007]). The father failed to meet his burden of establishing that he maintained substantial and continuous or repeated contact with the child through the payment of support and either regular visitation or other communication with the child (see Domestic Relations Law § 111 [1] [d]; Matter of Kevin A., Jr., 61 AD3d at 860; Matter of Serenity Anya C., 60 AD3d 852 [2009]; Matter of Sharissa G., 51 AD3d at 1020; Matter of Hassan Lawrence W., 42 AD3d 573 [2007]).
In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the father’s remaining contentions. Rivera, J.P., Florio, Angiolillo and Austin, JJ., concur.