Filed Date: 6/17/2010
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
We confirm. Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who recovered the subject items from petitioner’s cell and authored the report, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Tarantola v Selsky, 32 AD3d 1102, 1102 [2006]; Matter of Campisi v Goord, 23 AD3d 730, 731 [2005]). Petitioner’s assertion that he was not afforded adequate notice of the charges because the Spanish translation of the misbehavior report was inaccurate has not been preserved for our review given his failure to raise it either at the hearing or in his administrative appeal (see Matter of Gaines v Fischer, 67 AD3d 1080, 1081 [2009]). His remaining claims are also either unpreserved or are lacking in merit. Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the determination of guilt.
Peters, J.P., Lahtinen, Malone Jr., Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.