Filed Date: 2/3/2011
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Defendants failed to comply with a preliminary conference order and two compliance conference orders issued over a period of 14 months to produce witnesses for examinations before trial. However, given counsel’s failure to file an affirmation in compliance with 22 NYCRR 202.7 (a) (2), it was a provident exercise of discretion to provide defendants with a final opportunity to produce witnesses for examinations before trial (see Reidel v Ryder TRS, Inc., 13 AD3d 170 [2004]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Catterson, Acosta and Richter, JJ.