Filed Date: 2/15/2011
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
— Appeal by the defend
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in resentencing the defendant to a determinate term of imprisonment of SVa years, with three years of postrelease supervision (see People v Newton, 48 AD3d 115, 119-120 [2007]). In light of the defendant’s disciplinary history while incarcerated, which included 10 disciplinary citations, and his history of committing crimes while on parole, a further reduction of the defendant’s sentence was not warranted (see CPL 440.46 [3]; People v Almanzar, 43 AD3d 825 [2007]; cf. People v Colon, 77 AD3d 849 [2010]). Angiolillo, J.P., Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.