Filed Date: 5/26/2011
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J.
The complaint should be reinstated as to plaintiff Delos/Sirius because, accepting the facts as alleged in the complaint as true and affording plaintiff the benefit of every reasonable inference, it sufficiently asserts viable causes of action for malpractice (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). Delos/Sirius has standing to pursue its claims against defendant since it is undisputed that defendant represented Delos/Sirius in one declaratory judgment action. As to the second declaratory judgment action, the record supports the conclusion that a “near” privity relationship existed between the two (see State of Cal. Pub. Employees’ Retirement Sys. v Shearman & Sterling, 95 NY2d 427, 434 [2000]; Federal Ins. Co. v North Am. Specialty Ins. Co., 47 AD3d 52, 60 [2007]; Allianz Underwriters Ins. Co. v Landmark Ins. Co., 13 AD3d 172, 175 [2004]).
However, the complaint should be dismissed as to Delos/ Sirius’s insured coplaintiffs Dennis Organization, Inc. and Rick Dennis, because it fails to allege they suffered damages as a result of defendant’s alleged negligence that were not recompensed after Delos/Sirius, their insurer, paid to settle the underlying personal injury action (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442-443 [2007]; Stawski v Pasternack, Popish & Reif, P.C., 54 AD3d 619, 620 [2008]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Catterson, Renwick and DeGrasse, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 30798(U).]