Filed Date: 5/24/2011
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In opposition to the defendant insurer’s prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law based upon the plaintiffs five-month delay in reporting the underlying occurrence to it, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether the delay was reasonable, based upon a good faith belief in her nonliability. Therefore, under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see Bauerschmidt & Sons, Inc. v Nova Cas. Co., 69 AD3d 668, 669 [2010]; R & L Richmond Ave. Corp. v Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co., 56 AD3d 643 [2008]; St. James Mech., Inc. v Royal & Sunalliance, 44 AD3d 1030, 1031 [2007]; cf. Avery & Avery, P.C. v American Ins. Co., 51 AD3d 695 [2008]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is not properly before this Court. Mastro, J.E, Hall, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.