Citation Numbers: 75 A.D.2d 844, 427 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11453
Filed Date: 5/12/1980
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
an action to recover damages for breach of a collective bargaining agreement, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 8, 1980, which, inter alia, denied its motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to exhaust his remedies under the agreement. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, motion granted, and complaint dismissed. The use of the word "right” in the preamble of the section of the collective bargaining agreement entitled grievance procedure should not be construed to mean that the grievance resolution procedure contained therein was an optional method of dispute resolution (cf. Kornit v Board of Educ., 54 AD2d 959, mot for lv to app den 41 NY2d 804). The interpretation employed by Special Term is not in accord with this State’s policy toward the resolution of public sector labor disputes (see Civil Service Law, § 200; Matter of Acting Supt. of Schools of Liverpool Cent. School Dist. [United Liverpood Faculty Assn.], 42 NY2d 509, 512). It has been said that: "A contrary rule which would permit an individual employee to completely sidestep available griev