Filed Date: 9/20/1984
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/28/2024
— Appeal from a judgment of the
Upon this record, it was proper for the court to submit to the jury, as a question of fact, whether the breathalyzer test was administered to defendant within two hours of his arrest for driving while intoxicated (see People v Keane, 76 AD2d 963). Additionally, we do not find the concurrent sentences imposed in this case, i.e., a $500 fine and one year in the county jail on the conviction for driving with at least .10% of alcohol in his blood (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 1192, subd 2) and 60 days in the county jail on the conviction for driving while ability impaired by alcohol (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 1192, subd 1), to be harsh or excessive.
Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.