Filed Date: 6/17/1985
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/28/2024
Judgment affirmed.
Defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the plea allocution is not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hoke, 62 NY2d 1022; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, the allocution satisfied the basic requirements of People v Harris (61 NY2d 9) and thus vacatur is not warranted (see, People v Moore, 110 AD2d 720; People v De Santis, 108 AD2d 821; People v Schron, 109 AD2d 762).
The sentence of 7 to 21 years’ imprisonment imposed for manslaughter in the first degree, and which was the product of a negotiated plea, was not an abuse of discretion by the sentencing Judge (People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Nor do the facts of this case warrant a substitution of our discretion for that of the sentencing Judge (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80; People v Hyde, 110 AD2d 716). Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.