Citation Numbers: 113 A.D.2d 923, 493 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52550
Filed Date: 9/30/1985
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/28/2024
In an action to recover damages for breach of a contract for the sale of real property, plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kelly, J.), dated July 23, 1984, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment, and defendants cross-appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same order as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Order modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provision which denied that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment in its favor and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of plaintiffs motion. As so modified, order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
We agree with Special Term’s conclusion that the purported exercise by defendants of their right to cancel the subject contract was ineffectual and that they, therefore, wrongfully repudiated the contract (see, Sy Jack Realty Co. v Pergament Syosset Corp., 27 NY2d 449, 452). However, Special Term erred
We have examined defendants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.