Citation Numbers： 114 A.D.2d 1013, 496 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54057
Filed Date： 11/25/1985
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 10/28/2024
— In a stockholder’s derivative action, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.), dated March 25, 1985, which denied their motion for a protective order.
Order affirmed, with costs.
We agree with Special Term that a sufficient "basis for inquiry” exists on the face of the complaint to permit the requested discovery in this shareholder’s derivative action (see, Matter of Elias v Artistic Paper Box Co., 29 AD2d 118; Hegener v Party Tyme Prods., 24 AD2d 742; Pearson v Rosenberg, 22 AD2d 225). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.