Filed Date: 12/15/1986
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/28/2024
— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Giaccio, J.), rendered September 13, 1982, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal use of a firearm in the second degree,
Justice Lazer has been substituted for the late Justice Gibbons (see, 22 NYCRR 670.2 [c]).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court properly found that the witness Liver-men’s repeated observations of the defendant in the neighborhood in which the crime occurred, prior to the crime, including an observation of the defendant at a party earlier that evening, coupled with his ability to observe the defendant clearly during the commission of the crime, constituted a sufficient independent basis for his in-court identification.
Concerning the defendant’s contention that numerous instances of prosecutorial misconduct deprived him of a fair trial, we note that while some of the prosecutor’s remarks would have been better left unsaid, for the most part, the prosecutor’s remarks on summation were a fair response to remarks made by defense counsel on summation (see, People v Anthony, 24 NY2d 696). Moreover, any error was rendered harmless by the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.