Filed Date: 12/22/1986
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/28/2024
— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Calabretta, J.), rendered August 19, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts), criminal use of a firearm in the
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court did not err in ruling that Fahey’s in-court identification of the defendant would be permitted at trial inasmuch as Fahey’s observation of the defendant’s face for about one minute, in a well-lit office, at close range, sufficiently established an independent basis for her identification.
We also note that contrary to the defendant’s claim, the gun was properly admitted into evidence (see, People v Mirenda, 23 NY2d 439, 452-453, People v Del Vermo, 192 NY 470). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Spatt, JJ., concur.