Filed Date: 3/27/2013
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 13
Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal from the order dated February 17, 2011, is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the plaintiffs application is granted.
Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court should have permitted the plaintiff to withdraw its motion to discontinue the action, in effect, without prejudice (see generally Connors, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C2211:9). Rivera, J.P, Hall, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.