Citation Numbers: 158 A.D.2d 361, 551 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1387
Filed Date: 2/15/1990
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/31/2024
This action, which was not commenced until November 1986, or 11 years and 1 month after the alleged malpractice, would normally have been time barred. However, CPLR 210 (b) provides for an 18-month period after the death of the person against whom a cause of action exists, during which the time for commencing an action against his executor or administrator is tolled. The defendant argues for a rule that where, as here, such a tolling of the Statute of Limitations occurs within a longer period of limitation, the two periods should merge and run concurrently. Pursuant to the holding in Glamm v Allen (57 NY2d 87), however, CPLR 210 (b) serves to add 18 months to the Statute of Limitations period. As applied to the case at bar, this additional toll renders the litigation timely. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ross, Kassal and Smith, JJ.