Citation Numbers: 158 A.D.2d 456, 551 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1258
Filed Date: 2/5/1990
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/31/2024
We find that the record does not support the court’s conclusion that the petitioner was responsible for the delay in reconvening the hearing after August 11, 1985. No evidence was offered that the Hearing Panel Chairman ever set a date for the hearing to reconvene. The school district failed to offer any evidence that the petitioner interfered with its efforts to pursue the disciplinary charges. The parties signed a stipulation dated November 12, 1985, which resulted in the petitioner’s resignation, effective December 15, 1985. Under these circumstances in the absence of proof that the petitioner was responsible for any delay in the hearing process between August 11 and December 15, 1985, he may not be denied salary and benefits for that period (see, Gerber v New York City Hous. Auth., 42 NY2d 162; Matter of Derle v North Bellmore Union Free School Dist., supra; see generally, Matter of Adlerstein v Board of Educ., 64 NY2d 90). Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.