Citation Numbers: 171 A.D.2d 668
Filed Date: 3/4/1991
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/31/2024
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Santagata, J.), rendered February 3, 1989, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, assault in the second degree and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the hearing court properly declined to suppress the lineup and in-court identification testimony of two prosecution witnesses. The defendant argues that the witnesses’ viewings of a high school yearbook were unduly suggestive and thus tainted the subsequent lineup procedures. However, the record reveals no evidence that the yearbook displayed the defendant’s photograph in an unduly suggestive manner (see, People v Jones, 166 AD2d 722;
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Hooper, J. P., Lawrence, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.