Citation Numbers: 173 A.D.2d 584, 570 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7678
Filed Date: 5/20/1991
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
In consolidated actions to recover damages and for injunctive relief arising from the alleged illegal operation of a junk yard, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burstein, J.), dated December 4, 1989, as denied, in part, that branch of their motion which was for leave to serve an amended complaint asserting causes of action based upon General Municipal Law § 136, by permitting only the assertion of a cause of <■ action based upon General Municipal Law § 136 (14).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
By its clear and express terms, all of General Municipal Law § 136, with the exception of subdivision (14) thereof,
The plaintiffs’ assertion that General Municipal Law § 136 has been incorporated by reference into the Oyster Bay Code is without merit. Oyster Bay Code § 14-9 purports to incorporate "all other statutes now existing or which may hereafter be enacted affecting [junk yard] businesses] or the conduct thereof’ (emphasis added). By its own terms, General Municipal Law § 136 "shall not be construed to affect * * * zoning ordinances or local laws or any other ordinances * * * for the control of junk yards now in effect or hereafter enacted in any municipality * * * and shall not be deemed to apply to any municipality which has any ordinance or local law or regulation to license or regulate junk yards” (General Municipal Law § 136 [12]).
Therefore, again save for its subdivision (14), General Municipal Law § 136 is not a statute "affecting” junk yards within the jurisdiction of the Town of Oyster Bay. Kunzeman, J. P., Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.