Citation Numbers: 177 A.D.2d 975
Filed Date: 11/15/1991
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/31/2024
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly granted summary judgment to defendants dismissing the complaint. The defendants named in the complaint were not the owners or operators of
Plaintiff’s contention that Peter J. Schmitt Co. should be estopped from denying proper service lacks merit. Plaintiff argues that defendants induced the misnomer because the insurance company for the named defendants referred to its insured as Bells Supermarket and Bells Retail Associates "and even after the defendants received the summons in the case six days before the Statute of Limitations expired they did not notify plaintiff that she should have sued their affiliate, Peter J. Schmitt Co.” The proof submitted by plaintiff in response to the motion to dismiss does not show any improper conduct on the part of the insurance company which induced the misnomer or improper service. There is no showing that either the insurance company or Peter J. Schmitt Co. made any misrepresentation which induced the misnomer, and they were under no obligation to inform plaintiff of the proper defendant. Further there was no showing that Peter J. Schmitt Co. was an "affiliate” of the named defendants and there was no showing that Peter J. Schmitt Co. did anything to mislead plaintiff. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Callahan, A. P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.