Citation Numbers: 178 A.D.2d 922, 578 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17725
Filed Date: 12/26/1991
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/31/2024
— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs’ submissions in opposition to the motion raised a triable issue of fact whether defendant affirmatively caused or created the dangerous condition in the parking lot owned and maintained by the Village. If so, prior written notice of the defect or condition was not required under Village Law § 6-628 (see, Barrett v City