Filed Date: 10/3/2013
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
While the deeds to the properties reflect title held by certain individual partners of the family partnerships as tenants in common, the abundant circumstantial trial evidence shows that the original partners considered the partnerships to be the true owners of the properties (see Vick v Albert, 17 AD3d 255, 256-257 [1st Dept 2005]). Moreover, the property management agreements, of which defendants were well aware, expressly so stated. Nor are defendants bona fide purchasers for value, since they actively ignored evidence that Spahn may have misrepresented both the ownership status of the properties and the nature of her interests therein (see Fleming-Jackson v Fleming, 41 AD3d 175 [1st Dept 2007]).
We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.