Filed Date: 10/2/2013
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his resentencing to a term that included the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law, since, at the time he was resentenced, he had not yet completed the sentence of imprisonment originally imposed upon him (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630 [2011]; People v Quinones, 103 AD3d 756 [2013]; People v Lovett, 102 AD3d 812 [2013]; People v Harris, 86 AD3d 543 [2011]). Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.