Filed Date: 12/8/1992
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/31/2024
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William J. Davis, J.), entered May 21, 1991, which, inter alia, permanently enjoined defendants-appellants from allowing any and all persons subletting the store premises or any portion thereof located at 65 Fifth Avenue to sell or display merchandise on the street outside 65 Fifth Avenue or on the exterior or in the entrances to such store premises, or to make alterations to the store premises without first obtaining approval therefor from plaintiff, and directed defendants-appellants to restore the storefront of the store numbered 4 at 65 Fifth Avenue to a condition satisfactory to plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
We reject the defendants-appellants’ contention that an issue of fact exists as to whether their subtenants have ceased
Similarly, with respect to the unauthorized alteration of the storefront by the defendants’ subtenant, Hindi Sulian, the installation of double-width entrance doors clearly constituted a substantial structural modification (see, Two Guys v S.F.R. Realty Assocs., 63 NY2d 396, 400) and the record reveals no factual issue as to whether or not plaintiff unreasonably withheld its consent to such alteration. Indeed, defendants have failed to submit any probative evidence demonstrating that such consent was, in fact, sought from plaintiff. We have considered the defendants’ remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Carro, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.