Citation Numbers: 192 A.D.2d 354, 595 N.Y.S.2d 784, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3515
Filed Date: 4/8/1993
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/31/2024
—Order of
We find the evidence sufficient to support the findings because of respondent’s accessorial conduct in the attack upon the victim. Not only was respondent well aware of the attack upon the victim by the others, respondent joined in the attack with the similar intent to inflict serious harm upon the victim. In fact, the evidence indicates that respondent threw "dangerous objects” at the victim (see, People v McClary, 138 AD2d 413). There is no reason to question the trial court’s credibility determinations in light of the fact that the trial court was in the most advantageous position to judge the witnesses’ credibility (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Concur— Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Wallach and Kassal, JJ.