Filed Date: 2/26/2014
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contentions that certain testimony was improperly admitted at trial are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Graves, 85 NY2d 1024 [1995]). In any event, her contentions are without merit (see People v Reid, 19 NY3d 382, 388 [2012]; People v Keindl, 68 NY2d 410, 422 [1986]).
The defendant’s attorney provided meaningful representation (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]). Mastro, J.P, Dickerson, Lott and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.