Filed Date: 9/30/1994
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/31/2024
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court denied the motion by defendant Harmer-Hill General Contractors, Inc. (Harmer-Hill) to vacate a judgment for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (4). That judgment
Although the court should have decided the motion on the merits, we shall do so in the interest of judicial economy. We conclude that plaintiff acquired jurisdiction over Harmer-Hill pursuant to CPLR 312-a upon receipt of attorney Patricia Driscoll’s acknowledgement of receipt of summons and complaint on behalf of Harmer-Hill. In its brief, Harmer-Hill abandoned its position that it had received by mail only the blank acknowledgement of service but not the summons and complaint. It stated that plaintiff mailed the summons, complaint and acknowledgement to it, and that it forwarded those documents to Driscoll. Harmer-Hill’s reliance on Broman v Stern (172 AD2d 475) is misplaced because the summons and complaint in that case were mailed to the attorney for the party to be served (cf., CPLR 312-a [a]). We reject the argument that plaintiff is entitled to sanctions. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J.—Vacate Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.