Filed Date: 12/13/1994
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/31/2024
Defendant escrow agent’s noncompliance with the court order directing release of the funds held in escrow justified plaintiffs’ institution of the action and bars whatever right defendant might otherwise have had to reimbursement of attorneys’ fees expended in defending the action (compare, Breed, Abbott & Morgan v Hulko, 139 AD2d 71, affd 74 NY2d 686). Concur—Wallach, J. P., Kupferman, Ross, Asch and Rubin, JJ.