Judges: Pine
Filed Date: 12/23/1994
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/31/2024
—Order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: No appeal as of right lies from an intermediate order in a CPLR article 78 proceeding (see, CPLR 5701 [b] [1]). We treat the notice of appeal as a request for permission to appeal and grant leave so that we may address the merits (see, CPLR 5701 [c]).
We conclude, therefore, that Supreme Court properly held that respondent’s determination was arbitrary and capricious and without a rational basis.
All concur except Pine, J. P., who dissents and votes to reverse in the following Memorandum.