Filed Date: 6/20/1995
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/31/2024
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), rendered July 7,1993, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.
Since the defense position, presented in opening, explored through cross-examination, and argued in summation, was
Defendant’s argument that he was prejudiced by the court’s instructions to the jury, within its final charge, that the case must be determined on the evidence or lack thereof regarding only the two crimes charged, without speculation in connection with testimony regarding events either before or after the alleged sale, is unpersuasive in light of the presumption that the court’s instructions were understood and followed by the jurors (People v Davis, 58 NY2d 1102, 1104).
We have examined defendant’s other contention and find it to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.