DocketNumber: Appeal No. 1
Filed Date: 6/9/1995
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/31/2024
The prime landlords then sold the property to plaintiff and notified CTG that all future payments due under the sublease should be paid directly to plaintiff. CTG made those payments to plaintiff for about three years. When it was unsuccessful in its efforts to modify that lease, CTG ceased making payments required by that lease, as amended, and plaintiff commenced this action to recover the amounts due under the lease. The conduct of CTG constituted an attornment (see generally, 74 NY Jur 2d, Landlord and Tenant, § 720) and, because CTG did not dispute the amount alleged to be due, the court properly granted judgment to plaintiff. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.