Filed Date: 1/21/1997
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Appeal by defen
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant argues that his guilt was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Insofar as he contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the conviction, his claim is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245, 250). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.