Filed Date: 1/27/1997
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Browne, J.), dated January 17, 1996, which, after a hearing, granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and the facts, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings on the indictment.
On July 26, 1994, two police officers, both specially trained members of the Taxi and Livery Task Force, were assigned to
The court erred in concluding that the defendant’s arrest was without probable cause and that the physical evidence recovered should be suppressed. The officers, who were well trained and experienced, and who were investigating crimes against cab drivers in a neighborhood where such robberies had frequently occurred, had reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle when they noticed the unusual, aggressive gestures of its occupants (see, e.g., People v Heron, 185 AD2d 859). Thereafter, as soon as they saw the bag of what appeared to be cocaine on the floor of the cab’s rear compartment, they had probable cause to arrest the defendant (People v Landy, 59 NY2d 369). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.