Filed Date: 6/2/1997
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
In
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the jury verdict in favor of the defendant New York City Transit Authority was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134; CPLR 4404 [a]). The plaintiff was not entitled to a missing witness charge (see, People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.