Judges: Peters
Filed Date: 9/17/1997
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Carpinello, J.), entered July 2, 1996 in Ulster County, which granted plaintiff’s motion for a conditional order of preclusion.
In December 1993, plaintiff commenced this mechanic’s lien
In an attempt to ascertain the completion date of the contract, plaintiff served BOCES with a notice of discovery and inspection for information pertaining thereto. However, BOCES responded that, despite its efforts to obtain the information requested, such information was unavailable as it was not in its possession. Thereafter, plaintiff moved to deem the issue of the contract completion date in its favor and to preclude defendants from presenting any evidence thereon at trial. Supreme Court conditionally granted plaintiffs motion, giving defendants 30 days within which to produce the information sought. BOCES appealed challenging the order of preclusion.
During the pendency of this appeal, plaintiff moved for and was granted a final order of preclusion which determined that the completion date of the construction project was resolved in plaintiffs favor. It further precluded SRC and Titan from presenting any evidence thereon at trial. As no timely appeal has been taken from such final order, we dismiss this appeal as moot (see generally, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707; Reid v Reid, 166 AD2d 811, 812).
Crew III, J. P., White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.