Citation Numbers: 244 A.D.2d 276, 664 N.Y.S.2d 296
Filed Date: 11/25/1997
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2022
—Judgment, Supreme
Defendant’s request for a missing witness charge was properly denied. Although defendant was aware prior to the commencement of testimony that the People did not intend to call the alleged missing witness, defendant waited until both sides had rested to make his request. Under these circumstances, the request was properly denied as untimely (People v Ramirez, 221 AD2d 178, lv denied 87 NY2d 1023). In any event, the People established that the witness “had become unavailable by the time of the trial despite reasonable efforts to locate him” (People v Jenkins, 213 AD2d 279, 280, lv denied 85 NY2d 974).
Defendant’s claim that he was prejudiced by the court’s submission to the jury of the completed crime of robbery in the second degree, notwithstanding his ultimate acquittal of that charge, is without merit (People v Brown, 83 NY2d 791, 794; People v Cruzado, 239 AD2d 160). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Wallach, Tom and Andrias, JJ.