Citation Numbers: 261 A.D.2d 910, 689 N.Y.S.2d 326, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4977
Filed Date: 5/7/1999
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners, the owners of an access easement providing for the use and enjoyment of lakefront property on Canandaigua Lake, were granted a certificate of
Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition. Because the certificate of existing nonconforming use was issued on the basis of petitioners’ misleading representations, it was properly revoked (see, Matter of Parkview Assocs. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274, 282, rearg denied 71 NY2d 995, appeal dismissed and cert denied 488 US 801; Matter of Brock v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 237 AD2d 670, 672). The ZBA’s determination denying the area variances requested by petitioners is not arbitrary and capricious (see, Matter of Sasso v Osgood, 86 NY2d 374, 384-386). Although petitioners also contend that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence, that standard of review is not applicable here (see, Matter of Sasso v Osgood, supra, at 385, n 2). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Scudder, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Callahan, JJ.