Filed Date: 3/21/2000
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered November 29, 1999, dismissing the complaint pursuant to an order, same court and Justice, also entered November 29, 1999, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from the order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.
Although on a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action the facts pleaded are presumed to be true and accorded every favorable inference, allegations consisting of bare legal conclusions, as well as factual claims that are contradicted by documentary evidence, are not entitled to such consideration (see, Quatrochi v Citibank, 210 AD2d 53). The IAS Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s breach of contract claims since the documentary evidence showed that the exchange rate selected by defendant was in accordance with the parties’