Filed Date: 3/29/2000
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contention that certain issues of fact were removed from the jury’s consideration by Supreme Court in its charge is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, any error is harmless (see, People v Brewington, 145 AD2d 962, 963, lv denied 74 NY2d 661; see also, People v Dudley, 201 AD2d 664, lv denied 83 NY2d 871). The facts to which the court referred do not es