Filed Date: 3/29/2000
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish that he committed the crime of criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law § 215.51 [b] [vi]) by intentionally placing the person for whom an order of protection had been issued in reasonable fear of her physical safety (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). The victim testified that defendant struggled with her on two separate occasions minutes apart in an effort’to prevent her from calling the police and that, in the course of forcibly grabbing the order of protection from her hands, defendant threatened to beat her if she contacted the police.
We also reject the contention of defendant that, because he