Filed Date: 8/14/2000
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
—In an action to recover damages for breach of a commercial lease, the defendants Le Peep International, Inc., Le Peep Restaurants, Inc., and Le Peep Grills, Inc., appeal from (1) a decision of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Shifrin, R.), dated June 22, 1999, and (2) a judgment of the same court dated July 20, 1999, which, after trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $591,987.99.
Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed as no appeal lies from a decision (see, CPLR 5701); and it is further,
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,
Contrary to the appellants’ contention, the record supports the Referee’s determination that after the appellants abandoned the subject premises, the plaintiff landlord re-let the premises for its own account rather than for the appellants’ benefit (see, Holy Props. v Cole Prods., 87 NY2d 130).
Additionally, the award of an attorney’s fee was a provident exercise of discretion (see, Burstin Investors v K.N. Investors, 239 AD2d 376).
The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.