Filed Date: 3/22/2001
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
—Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Felice Shea, J.), entered on
The police officers herein acted on the complaint of an informant who flagged them down, possibly stated his name, candidly advised them that he had not personally witnessed the gun-menacing incident that he was reporting but that he had had prior encounters with defendant, provided a detailed description and the location of defendant, a construction site security guard, and volunteered to locate the alleged victim, who was his friend and neighbor. Unde! such circumstances, the officers had sufficient basis to find that the informant was credible (see, People v Kadan, 195 AD2d 174, 178, lv denied 83 NY2d 854), that his basis of knowledge was a conversation with his friend, a crime victim, and sufficient cause to make inquiry of defendant (see, People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 223). Upon proceeding to the construction site and finding the defendant as described, the officers had justification, given the tenor of the report, to engage in a precautionary patdown of defendant (see, People v Salaman, 71 NY2d 869, 870). Defendant’s request to excuse himself briefly and his repeated reaching for his right rear waistband area, upon the officers’ approaching him with weapons bolstered, provided further justification for the stop and frisk (see, People v Bruce, 78 AD2d 169, 172-174, lv denied 52 NY2d 1074; see also, People v Corbett, 258 AD2d 254, lv denied 93 NY2d 898). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.