Filed Date: 10/1/2001
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
—In an accounting proceeding, the petitioner appeals from (1) stated portions of a decision of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Emanuelli, S.), dated February 24, 2000, and (2) so much of an order of the same court, dated April 10, 2000, entered upon the decision, as granted that branch of the respondents’ motion which was to compel it to produce certain documents and witnesses to respond to deposition questions.
Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision (see, Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.
The attorney-client privilege may not be raised to prevent disclosure of communications relevant to the common interest of former joint clients in subsequent litigation (see, Wallace v Wallace, 216 NY 28, 35; Matter of Friedman, 64 AD2d 70, 84; 58A NY Jur 2d, Evidence and Witnesses, § 876). The appellant and the objectant Suzanne McCormick were both executors of the estate of Edmund J. McCormick. The law firm of White and Case represented the estate and the executors. Notwith
The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J. P., Krausman, S. Miller and Florio, JJ., concur.