Citation Numbers: 137 A.D.3d 1742, 27 N.Y.S.3d 417
Judges: Carni, Centra, Dejoseph, Troutman, Whalen
Filed Date: 3/25/2016
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John J. Brunetti, A.J.), rendered October 21, 2014. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). We reject defendant’s contention that Supreme Court erred in assessing 30 points against him based on a 1986 conviction. Defendant’s challenge to that conviction is not properly before us on this appeal from the SORA determination (see generally People v Buniek, 121 AD3d 659, 659 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 914 [2015]; People v Clavette, 96 AD3d 1178, 1179 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 851 [2012]; People v Ayala, 72 AD3d 1577, 1578 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 816 [2010]). Defendant moved pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (h) to vacate that conviction before the SORA determination, but the court denied the motion, and defendant did not seek permission from this Court to appeal from that order (see CPL 450.15 [1]; 460.15 [1]). We reject defendant’s further contention that the court erred in assessing 10 points against him for failure to accept responsibility.