Citation Numbers: 288 A.D.2d 133, 733 N.Y.S.2d 175, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11326
Filed Date: 11/27/2001
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dora Irizarry, J.), rendered December 21, 1999, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and attempted sexual abuse in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 3V2 to 7 years and IV2 to 3 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. Immediately after lawfully arresting defendant on a crowded subway platform, the pohce, who had been informed by the victim and by a witness that defendant had used a knife in the
The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, after affording defendant sufficient opportunity to present his claims of innocence and coercion. The court was thoroughly familiar with the proceedings, including the plea allocution, and was able to make the requisite “informed and prudent determination” (People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520, 525) that defendant’s claims were unfounded (see, People v Pemberton, 268 AD2d 236).
Defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of his factual recitation is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interests of justice (see, People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666). Were we to review this claim, we would find that nothing in the plea allocution cast doubt on defendant’s guilt.
We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Tom, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.