Filed Date: 4/16/2002
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Judgment, Su
Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. The only issue raised on appeal is the reliability of the informant, an arrested drug dealer who advised the police that defendant was his supplier. The informant’s statement was a declaration against his penal interest, as well as being thoroughly corroborated (see, People v Johnson, 66 NY2d 398), particularly by the fact that the informant accurately advised of defendant’s arrival at a particular address, known by the police to be a drug location. Therefore, there was probable cause for defendant’s arrest. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Sullivan, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.