Filed Date: 5/13/2002
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the. defendants Santiago Texidor, Jr., and National Freight, Inc., appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), dated October 17, 2001, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 which was to strike their answer insofar as asserted on behalf of the defendant Santiago Texidor, Jr.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to strike the answer insofar as asserted on behalf of the defendant Santiago Texidor, Jr., is granted only to the extent that he is precluded from offering evidence on his own behalf at trial unless he appears for an examination before trial no later than 30 days prior to trial.
The defendant Santiago Texidor, Jr., willfully refused to appear at several examinations before trial and refused to coop
It is noted that all parties remain free to use contempt proceedings or a warrant of commitment and arrest to attempt to secure Texidor’s deposition or trial testimony (see Quintanilla v Harchack, supra). Altman, J.P., Smith, Krausman, McGinity and Cozier, JJ., concur.