Citation Numbers: 151 A.D.3d 583, 54 N.Y.S.3d 286
Judges: Acosta, Feinman, Kahn, Richter, Webber
Filed Date: 6/20/2017
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Defendant’s challenges to his plea do not come within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement (see People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 382 [2015]), and we decline to review these unpreserved claims in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the plea was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made. The sequence in which the court conducted the allocution was permissible (see People v Gillegbower, 143 AD3d 479 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1145 [2017]). Defendant’s other challenges to the plea are without merit.